I have fallen behind in my surveys of the cricket magazines of half-a-century ago. My summer holiday task is to catch up, starting with the October editions.
The focus of both The
Cricketer and Playfair Cricket
Monthly was the fifth test at the Oval that concluded the best Ashes series
in England since the Second World War. It was decided on the sixth day, the last
test in England to have such a provision until the final of the World Test
Championship in 2021.
Centuries by both Chappells gave Australia a first-innings
advantage of 115, but debutant Barry Wood’s 90 led a strong response to set a target
of 242, a cinch in the era of Bazball but quite a challenge in 1972.
England were handicapped by the depletion of their attack
through the second innings: D’Oliveira had a bad back, Illingworth turned his
ankle and Snow had the flu, “sick and shaking” as he managed a single over with
the second new ball.
At 171 for five, Jack Fingleton, according to Basil Easterbrook,
“groaned and said ‘It’s too many for us now’ ”, but Paul Sheahan and Rod Marsh
took them home without further loss.
England’s top scorer in the match was Alan Knott, with 92
and 63. The other day one of the Australian TV commentators said that Adam
Gilchrist had re-written the book on how wicketkeepers batted in test matches.
Gilchrist, brilliant as he was, merely added a chapter to Knott’s draft. This match
was one of many on which Knott had a critical influence with the bat, and in a
way that ignored cricket’s geometry. He would have broken the bank in an IPL
auction.
Both titles agree that Australia deserved to (at least)
draw the series. Easterbrook’s summary put it in historical context.
Australia won both their
victories after losing the toss. They had the series outstanding bowler in
Lillee, the best supporting bowler in Massie and their batsmen produced five
centuries, whereas the best England could manage were three innings in the 90s.
If Australia, who were beaten in vile weather in Manchester and on an unworthy
pitch at Leeds, did not have the luck this time it perhaps went some way to
compensate for the period between 1961 and 1968 when three Australian sides in
no way superior to England…undeservedly held on to The Ashes.
John Woodcock agreed that Lillee had a decisive influence,
which he expressed in the language of the time.
He runs a tediously long way;
yet to see him pounding in to bowl, and to put oneself in the batsman’s shoes,
is to know one is watching a man’s game.
Not quite how I would put it, but Lillee running in, shirt
billowing, with a Dick Dastardly scowl, was one of the great sights of cricket.
Clive Lloyd made one of the finest Lord’s-final centuries
in the first World Cup in 1975. Three years earlier he made another as Lancashire
won the Gillette Cup for the third successive year (Jack Bond, Lancashire skipper, is pictured with the trophy on the cover of Playfair). It was the centrepiece of
the reports by Michael Melford for The
Cricketer and Gordon Ross for Playfair.
Melford noted the power of Lloyd’s drives:
…most of them, off fast
bowling, went at such a pace that the bowler, deep mid-on and deep mid-off
scarcely moved before the ball was past them.
For Ross, it was the cross-bat shots:
Three times he cleared the
boundary ropes with massive pulls, and it made no difference whatsoever who was
bowling; this was utter domination of the attack.
Bryon Butler’s press review in The Cricketer collected more acclaim for the Guyanan, from Arlott,
Swanton, Marlar, and from Dennis Compton, who got quite carried away in the Sunday Express:
This was the greatest innings
I have ever seen at Lord’s at any level. I have seen and played against Sir
Donald Bradman, Walter Hammond, Stan McCabe, Sir Frank Worrell, Clive [sic] Walcott, Everton Weekes and many
other great players in full flow: but I have never seen an attack torn to
pieces like this.
The October editions cover the first ODIs—or one-day tests
as they were referred to—played in England, the first anywhere except for the hastily
arranged inaugural at Melbourne the previous year. England won an entertaining
series two-one. In the first game, Dennis Amiss became the first century-maker in
this form of the international game.
It will surprise many to see that, in the absence of the
injured Illingworth, England were captained by Brian Close. A more obvious
choice might have been Tony Lewis, already named as captain of MCC’s tour of
India, Pakistan and Ceylon (as Sri Lanka was then known). Illingworth, along
with Boycott and Snow, had made himself unavailable for a gruelling schedule that
included eight test matches over more than four months.
EW Swanton’s editorial in The Cricketer once again deployed the royal pronoun in critiquing
the tour party:
We must admit to
disappointment that the promising new material among the 21-25 brigade has been
overlooked.
The only player under 25 was Chris Old. The India correspondent
of The Cricketer, KN Prabhu, reported
on an underwhelmed response to the selection. The editor of a sports magazine
demanded that the tour be called off if England were to be represented by a
second XI. The Indian Express was
barely less damning, saying that the team
…might be well balanced in
that the standard of its batsmanships [sic]
and bowling are likely to balance each other in mediocrity.
Prabhu himself was not so quick to write off the tourists,
noting the success of various members of the party as members of an
International XI some years before.
England won the first test in India before losing the next
two narrowly, by 28 runs and four wickets. The final two matches in the series
were drawn, as were all three in Pakistan, a reminder of how historically
difficult it has been to attain a positive result on those pitches. The
achievement of the McCullum/Stokes team in winning three-nil in similar
conditions is one of the great achievements of the intervening half century.
No comments:
Post a Comment