Showing posts with label Ishant Sharma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ishant Sharma. Show all posts

Sunday, March 29, 2020

New Zealand v India, first test, Basin Reserve, 21–24 February 2020



This is an account of a test match played little more than a month ago, though it seems now to have been in another time, so much has happened since. To be able to watch cricket at all has become a matter for nostalgia. For us in New Zealand, at least it has come at the end of the season. We lost only a couple of rounds of the Plunket Shield. Let’s acknowledge that to view all this through a cricket lens is to get it badly wrong, but as someone who every year counted down the days until I could first risk April hypothermia on the roof of the Hammond Room in Bristol or elsewhere, I share the loss that county cricket watchers will feel right now.

Many of that group will wonder what county cricket will look like when it returns. Will it emerge with enough money to sustain 18 counties? Will those who seek to undermine the county structure, however much they deny it, ensure that it doesn’t?

For now, here is an account of four pleasant days at the cricket.

First day
The Basin Reserve looked a picture on a sunny morning. For the first time in almost a decade the Museum Stand was open, having been restored and strengthened against earthquakes. It has a new, somewhat unimaginative, name—the Old Pavilion. There is a new pavilion, the players’ area next to the RA Vance Stand. It might kindly be described as functional, though at least it is consistent with the architectural style of Wellington’s sports venues. Down the road, the Cake Tin, here the Bread Bin.

It has a good name though: the Ewen Chatfield Pavilion. In the UK Chatfield is best remembered for having his life saved by Bernard Thomas after edging a Peter Lever delivery onto his temple. Here, he is regarded as the quintessential New Zealand cricketer, military medium into the wind, setting the batsmen up for Richard Hadlee at the other end. Chatfield is still seen at the Basin whenever he can spare the time from driving his taxi. He retired from club cricket just last year, 51 years after his debut for the same club. He didn’t tell his Naenae Old Boys teammates until after the game that it was his last, as he didn’t want to draw attention to himself.

New Zealand won the toss—a novelty of itself at the Basin—and put India in on a pitch that had the browny-green hue of a stagnant pond. But the customary first-morning handouts were not on offer, nor did the pitch enter its usual coma after lunch. This was the best test pitch I have seen at the Basin, “best” not in the misused sense of being easy to bat on, but providing a balance between bat and ball. Throughout, there was assistance for the quicker bowlers, but it required work and skill to find it; there was bounce too, enough to test the batsmen. Ashwin even found some turn out of the footmarks; whether that would have developed into anything significant on the last day and a half, we will never know. It was a thousand times better than the dead tracks on which the England series was played.

There were six changes from the XI that I saw beaten in Sydney at the beginning of January. Williamson, Nicholls and Boult returned from illness and injury. Spinners Somerville and Astle made way for Ajaz Patel’s slow-left-arm (Sydney turned out to be Astle’s last first-class appearance—he announced his retirement soon thereafter). Pace bowler Kyle Jamieson made his test debut after impressing in the 50-over side. And Tim Southee returned. Southee’s omission from the XI at Sydney is one of New Zealand cricket’s great mysteries, our version of the disappearance of Agatha Christie in 1926. Watch out for a Dr Who episode entitled The Mysterious Dropping of Southee in a few years’ time. Neil Wagner was absent, supporting his wife as their first child was born. Matt Henry was omitted; he is slipping down the pecking order of New Zealand quick bowlers.

Prithvi Shaw and Mayank Agarwal opened for India. Twenty-year-old  Shaw could be the next big thing, but may never be good enough to deal with the sort of delivery that he received from Southee, which swung very late and hit the top of off.

Kyle Jamieson becomes New Zealand’s tallest test cricketer at six foot eight, topping Peter Fulton by a couple of inches. Like Tom Blundell, Jamieson has looked promising in domestic cricket without demanding an international place, but when given the opportunity looks as if he belongs there. Few players have pure talent in such quantity as to guarantee success at the highest level. For most, it comes down to how well they adapt to the challenges it presents. Jamieson relishes them. Barring statistical anomalies, have any other bowler’s first two test victims had a combined test batting average of more than 100?

Jamieson’s accurate off-stump line and tall-man’s bounce had induced diffidence in Pujara, and when a full-length ball straightened more sharply it found the edge to be caught by Watling. Kohli started aggressively, but in Jamieson’s next over edged another full-length delivery to Taylor at first slip.

Agarwal and Rahane took the innings well past luncheon (as I will continue to call it in tribute to John Woodcock), showing that the pitch was not combustable. It was misjudgement rather than movement that ended the partnership when Agarwal top-edged a pull to be caught at fine leg off Boult. Vihari became the third victim of Jamieson’s probing off-stump line. Progress was slow, with only 43 runs added in 27 overs during the afternoon session.

Rain came during the interval. Visiting crews in next year’s America’s Cup contest could usefully acclimatise themselves to New Zealand’s vigorous winds by doing a spell on the groundstaff at the Basin, some of whom might have been swept up over Mount Victoria while clinging onto the large groundsheet that serves as the primary covers. There was no further play; India finished the day on 122 for five.

Second day
The start of play each day was at 11 30, just as it used to be when I was a lad. However, unlike then, play here did not end at 6 30, giving us time to march briskly down the Old Dover Road to catch the 6 45 bus home. It sprawled on, not knowing quite how to end, like the Hobbit films made by Peter Jackson at the studios just down the road. The time lost yesterday was added on at the end of the day, rather than to the beginning, as was the case in the England series. This is because Indian TV wants it that way. There should be no complaint about this; the rights to this series will go a long way to keeping New Zealand cricket going for the next few years. The T20s had begun at 8pm, and that at the Cake Tin didn’t finish until gone midnight, after the losing super over that now seems obligatory for New Zealand. Some people who went didn’t get home until past 1 30am, yet were still in their seats for the first ball of the domestic one-day game at the Basin the following morning. Heroes.

Rishabh Pant resumed for India. He had been unusually subdued on the first day, but today he put the fourth ball of the morning in the food court next to the main stand.

Ajaz Patel was the bowler, on just to allow Southee to change ends. It was his third over, and last of the innings. He bowled the same number in the second innings, a reflection of how well the quicker bowlers bowled here. He was dropped for the second test, thanks partly to the poor record of spinners at Hagley Park. Also, de Grandhomme performs the holding and control role that is usually that of the spinner. The all-rounder’s 11 overs on the first day had cost only 12 runs.

However, Patel’s influence on events was not at an end. Rahane pushed a ball from Southee into the offside and set off for a sharp single. Pant took three paces down the pitch, then stopped. Rahane hesitated, but carried on. Patel, moving square from cover point, should have thrown the ball to Watling who was sprinting towards the stumps with plenty of time to take the bails off before Pant got there. Instead, Patel went for glory, and hit the one stump he had to aim at.

Pant’s selection as keeper was criticised by Harsha Bhogle as taking India down the well-trodden road of going for the better batsmen over the artisan keeper, Wriddhiman Saha in this case. Farokh Engineer agreed that Saha is the better gloveman but thought that the selectors were right to go for Pant as a package, the same reasoning having accounted for a good proportion of his own 46 test caps. Pant kept wicket well here.

Ashwin’s dismissal by Southee, was to a ball every bit as good as the one that dismissed Shaw. It was Ashwin’s first ball, but if it had been his two hundredth he would have stood no more chance of keeping it out.

Southee and Jamieson finished the innings off efficiently, both ending with four wickets. India’s total was 165 and would have been less but for Shami’s late-order slogging.

Now for something that I have been looking forward to for a few years: the chance to watch Jasprit Bumrah bowl. Bumrah’s run up resembles that of your aunty on her annual spell on the sands at Skegness, before turning into something wonderful as he passes the umpire. Like Lasith Malinga, Bumrah would never have survived a regimented academy system; he is a celebration of dissidence.

Tom Blundell continues to impress in his surprise role as a test opener, which he approached so seriously here that he did not get off the mark until the seventh over. There were a few false shots, and he was a little fortunate that balls that might have been caught landed in space, but he remained unfazed, an attribute for a batsman at the top of the order. He was still in when the spinner came on, always a sign (in New Zealand, at least) that the opener has done his job. The opening stand had reached 26 when Latham was dismissed somewhat softly, caught behind off a legside flick just after lunch.

Williamson’s first ball bounced steeply and took him on the gloves. That was just about the only false shot he played. He looked in prime touch from then on.

Blundell played around a Sharma inswinger to be bowled for 30 from a self-denying 80 deliveries. This brought in Ross Taylor in his hundredth test match, only the fourth New Zealander to achieve this after Fleming, Vettori and McCullum. What’s more, he became the first cricketer anywhere to notch up a century of international appearances in all three forms. I first came across him when he was a member of the New Zealand Under-19 squad in 2000/1 when I covered part of their series against South Africa for CricInfo. Just 16-years-old, he had scored a half century in each of the first two games, but only managed six when I saw him at New Plymouth and did not much better in the subsequent one-day series. The CricInfo scorer knew Ross quite well so he spent a bit of time with us. He came across as a modest but self-possessed young man, confident enough of his ability not to need to draw attention to it. The level-headedness has enabled him to make the most of the ability, and could be felt in the warmth of his welcome to the field as he came out to bat. Seven-thousand runs also helps, of course.

Two of his trademark shots came out straightaway. The not-quite-falling-over-push through the legside got him off the mark, then everybody’s favourite, the slog-sweep, nowadays generally reserved for the encore, but on this special day the opening number, putting Ashwin onto the terraces while still in single figures. To show that that he is down there with the kids, Taylor later ramped a boundary off the back of his bat.

The Williamson–Taylor partnership took New Zealand past India’s total for the loss of just two wickets, which was massively therapeutic for those of us who had been in Australia. But without addition Taylor was surprised by Sharma’s pace and gloved a catch to Pujara at backward short leg for 44.

Williamson continued give a reasonable impression of an angel at the crease. Two offside boundaries from one Bumrah over after he had been in for half an hour had the RA Vance Stand purring like a cattery at dinnertime. He was Shakespeare knocking off a sonnet, Rutherford splitting an atom. A century appeared inevitable, but on 89 he got a cover drive slightly wrong and substitute Jadeja took a good diving catch.

Henry Nicholls took 50 deliveries to reach double figures and was out to Ashwin, edging to gully a ball that turned quite sharply. Three of the other wickets fell to Sharma, who bowled splendidly. He has always been quick enough to bother good players but now has added guile. He exploited the extra bounce in this Basin pitch magnificently.

New Zealand were 51 ahead with five wickets standing when the sun disappeared behind the Old Pavilion to bring play to a close 20 minutes early.

Third day
Some test-match traditions are immutable. Picnics in the Harris Memorial Garden at Lord’s; beer snakes at Headingley; the band at Port Elizabeth; Chickie’s disco at the Recreation Ground, Antigua; that on one day of every test match played at the Basin Reserve there will be a southerly that could blast freeze molten lead. Today was that day.

Perhaps the wind had a chilling effect on BJ Watling’s judgement. He followed the first ball of the day from Bumrah—one that he could have been relied upon to leave 99 times out of 100—to be caught by Pant.

With the lead far from decisive and wickets falling fast, home supporters were in need of reassurance. In these circumstances the appearance of Tim Southee is as comforting as setting sail only to discover that the captain is wearing an eyepatch and brandishing a cutlass.

Sure enough, a couple of overs later he glanced a Sharma delivery that was well wide of leg stump straight to Shami at fine leg, possibly leaving the field as a test No 8 for the last time, given the fine performance by Kyle Jamieson that followed. Not many batsmen have hit a six before they are out of double figures in their debut innings as he did. Three more followed, as he showed equal relish for pace and spin. He was caught at long on going for a fifth six that would have taken him to a half century, having written his name on the New Zealand teamsheet in indelible ink.

Jamieson out de Grandhommed de Grandhomme, who was content to take the supporting role and to have the rare experience of watching himself bat. He was out soon after, feathering a legside catch off the glove to the keeper off Ashwin.

I am not generally a fan of music during play, but it would be quite reasonable if the Benny Hill theme were to ring out throughout every Trent Boult innings. He bats as if he hasn’t noticed that the library has given him the tennis coaching book rather than that for cricket. But what an eye he has. The most astonishing shot from a strong field of contenders was a full toss from Shami on middle stump that he clipped to the cover boundary while in retreat towards square leg. Boult made 38 from 24 balls including five fours and a six. New Zealand’s lead was 183.

Shaw looked in good touch with three offside boundaries in the first eight overs, before Boult’s extra bounce surprised him, though it needed a spectacular catch from Latham, stationed at leg gully for precisely that delivery, to complete the dismissal.

Pujara seemed just the man to bring India back into the game with a fighting innings. His defence was solid. De Grandhomme resorted to placing three catching short covers, to no avail. But Pujara couldn’t score. I was put in mind of the great CJ Tavaré at Lord’s in ’84 (and in many other places at many other times, to be fair), existing in a sort of temporal stasis.

Pujara was out to the last ball before tea, symbolically strokeless, leaving alone a Boult delivery angled in from wide of the crease that hit off. He made 11 from 81 balls.

In the final session, 66 runs were scored for the loss of two wickets, which sounds mundane. It was anything but; the cricket was gripping. The wickets were Agarwal, though it needed every bit of the DRS’s technology to confirm Aleem Dar’s caught-behind decision; and, crucially, Kohli, also caught behind, off a thin edge trying to hook Boult.

I had mixed feelings about this. It was a large step towards a home victory, but a cricket fan always wants to see the great players be great. I saw Kohli in his prime… He made a century last time India played at the Basin, but only when the game was dead. Given the punishing programme that Indian cricketers face, he might have been forgiven taking the foot off the pedal on a tour to a quiet corner of the world, but there has not been a second when Kohli has appeared anything other than consumed by his team’s interests. He has had a poor series with the bat, because he cares too much, not too little. The mutual respect and liking between him and Williamson has made for an excellent spirit between the two teams.

Fourth day
The wind had shifted back to a more social direction and was mostly absent; the sky was blue. It reminded me of days at Folkestone at the end of August, when summer had settled into contented, predictable old age.

India were 39 behind with six wickets standing, a good position for New Zealand, but there was anxiety among the Basin faithful. We have often seen recovery from an apparently hopeless position, usually by New Zealand: against India in 2014, Sri Lanka in 2015 and Bangladesh in 2017. We looked at the Indian team listed on the scoreboard and were impressed. There were plenty of runs left, more than that attack might give us.

Such pessimism. The game was over by lunchtime. That this was so was mainly down to the excellence of Boult and Southee, both at the point where physical ability and experience, or science and art, complement each other perfectly. Yesterday, Boult took three of the four wickets. Two of them were from short deliveries, testimony of itself to his skill, given that pace is not his chief weapon.

Boult took his fourth in the third over of the morning. Close enough to off stump to force Rahane to play, it moved just enough to take the edge of the bat.

Southee now took over. He began in the next over by working Vihari over a treat. First, he swung one away. The next one came in, through the gap created between bat and pad by the previous delivery.

Ashwin was leg-before, bringing in Sharma to buckle such swashes as remained. He was dropped twice, by Latham at short leg and Southee at short cover. Neither were difficult, but it didn’t matter. The latter miss was off de Grandhomme, who got the wicket he deserved by when he got Sharma leg-before.

Southee finished off the innings, helped by two brilliant catches, first by Boult at fine leg to dismiss Pant, then substitute Daryl Mitchell at second slip off Bumrah.

Southee finished with five for 61, Boult with four for 39. Richard Hadlee is New Zealand’s greatest bowler by a street, but these two are the outstanding bowling combination, one of the finest in cricket history. This was New Zealand’s 100th test victory, and Southee and Boult have bowled in combination in 28 of them.

Latham and Blundell completed the ten-wicket win without incident.

New Zealand took the second test in Christchurch by seven wickets, Southee and Boult again destroying India’s second innings after even first innings. So New Zealand took India apart after having the same done to them in Australia. What does this tell us about the state of world cricket?

The disadvantage of away teams remains an issue, though India’s preparation was better than most these days with the players not involved in the one-day series playing for India A against New Zealand A in four-day games. Perhaps the World Test Championship should give double points for away wins, though this assumes that anybody takes any notice of that competition which seems to have taken off like a hippo trying paragliding.

New Zealand are back to No 2 in the test rankings, just ahead of Australia and England. They are not scheduled to play tests again until August so are less immediately affected by the hiatus than some countries.

Stay safe, wherever you may be.



























Monday, June 2, 2014

New Zealand v India, second Test, Basin Reserve, 14 – 18 February 2014, third day: McCullum’s great innings

http://www.espncricinfo.com/new-zealand-v-india-2014/engine/match/667653.html

Day three

Four o’clock. That was when I told my Khandallah correspondent to expect my return to My Life in Cricket Scorecards Towers, having watched New Zealand lose the test match. Many would have thought that a conservative estimate; after all, taxonomists mostly classify New Zealand’s batting under “invertebrate”.

That is what is so wonderful about test cricket. Nobody had a clue that we would see the start of New Zealand’s finest test match innings, or that it would lead a rearguard action that would draw the match and win the series. Four million looking a billion in the face and not blinking. What is more, our appreciation of what we had seen had not advanced much by the time we left the ground at 6.30. Test match cricket possesses a paradox that few if any other sports do: that you may not understand what you have seen until several days later.

There was little in the first half of the day to suggest that anything other than the tiresomely predictable was on. At afternoon drinks New Zealand were 121 for five, 125 short of making India bat again and a four pm homecoming still on the cards.

With Ross Taylor absent for the birth of his second child, a disproportionate amount of New Zealand’s hopes went out of the window in the second over of the day when Kane Williamson was caught behind off Zaheer Khan. This brought together two young left-handers—Rutherford and Latham—who, if every gram of their promise is turned into performance, will spend many hours together at the crease in the decade to come.

Not today, however. Rutherford had reached 35 when he mimicked Williamson’s mode of dismissal. This was a better ball though, swinging away late down the line of off stump.

Let it be recorded that Brendon McCullum came in at this point, with his side 52 for three. A pensive period of play followed, until half an hour or so before lunch something happened that did not seem to matter much at the time. McCullum completely mistimed a drive to a full-length ball from Mohammed Shami. Virat Kohli, at a very straight silly mid-on, spilled a reasonably simple chance. See my remarks about not understanding what you have seen, above. In that moment the match and the series slipped away from India.

Tom Latham became Dhoni’s third victim of the session from the first ball of the last over before lunch. It was a nothing shot, pushing outside off at a ball that could easily have been left alone. Corey Anderson lasted only six balls before giving Jadeja a return catch off the leading edge. BJ Watling now joined McCullum.

Play until tea was a throwback to an earlier time, exactly two an over from 26 overs. Again, it did not seem as gripping as it actually was, as the idea that New Zealand could hang on for long enough to save the game seemed the sort of proposition that might eminate only from an email of Nigerian origin. And McCullum was dropped again, a harder chance than the previous one. Ishant Sharma could not quite hold on to a return catch as he followed through, one of those chances that comes down entirely to instinct.

Up to this point McCullum had batted against type, focusing purely on defence. It was Ken Dodd playing Hamlet. Perhaps he decided to add a shot of caffeine to his play to make him more alert, or maybe the Indian attack became stale. Whatever the reason, it was the authentic McCullum who resumed after tea, no chance to score spurned. He went from 50 to 100 at a run a ball, reaching three figures by putting Sharma into the crowd at long on. Like the rest of us, India had no appreciation of what was going on and were mentally heading for the airport doing nothing more than waiting for the batsmen to make mistakes.

Praise for BJ Watling should be fulsome too. At the end of the day he had 52 from 202 balls. More and more it seems that Watling has the temperament of a test player. New Zealand took the lead shortly before the end of the day, and we left the ground heartened by a performance that had heart and character. But we also knew that New Zealand would have to bat for another day to put the game beyond India, whose strokeplayers could rattle up 250-plus on a pitch that had not given up a wicket in almost two sessions. We had seen the Holy Grail but mistaken it for a shiny egg cup.

Days four and five

I was not at the Basin for the final two days but, in common with much of the population of New Zealand it seems, followed the game at a distance and watched the recordings later. Brendon McCullum batted throughout the fourth day and reached his triple century early on the fifth morning, watched by a crowd which contained the largest proportion of spectators dressed in suits and ties seen in New Zealand since the thirties. All over Wellington men of a certain age were seen hurrying to an urgent 11 am meeting at an undisclosed location.

McCullum was supported royally by Watling, who reached 124 from 367 balls, and Jimmy Neesham, who took a debut century off a tired attack from 123 balls. When I first saw Neesham I wrote how comfortable he looked at provincial level, and have the same opinion a grade higher. This is not say that he is the finished article, not by a long chalk, but there is enough emerging talent in New Zealand cricket for us to approach the future with our usual apprehension diluted somewhat.

So how good was McCullum’s innings? I have given it more than three months, in attempt to achieve perspective, only to find that there isn’t any. It was the finest innings ever played by a New Zealander in a test match, and not just because it was the biggest and the longest. Had McCullum been out at any point before he passed 250—about an hour before the end of the fourth day—New Zealand would almost certainly have lost.

Search the records and it is difficult to find an innings quite like it, one of such sustained defiance in the face of defeat. Hanif Mohammad’s 337 against the West Indies in 1958 is the only comparable triple century (and the only higher score in a team’s second innings). The danger of defeat was present almost throughout then too, but it was dour defence all the way, unleavened by McCullum’s willingness to take them on. Pakistan progressed at only a fraction over two an over. Had McCullum been as stately, New Zealand would have lost.

Martin Crowe’s 299 against Sri Lanka at the Basin in 1991 (still unwise to say “hey Marty, one short eh?” by the way) was also in pursuit of a large deficit, but he came in at 148 for two and the danger of defeat passed sooner.

VVS Laxman’s 281 in the greatest of all Tests, at Kolkota in 2001 also saw the prospect of losing the game recede at an earlier point. There are many other examples of fine, courageous long innings that saved teams from defeat, but none with the odds against success stacked so highly for so long. One of test cricket’s greatest innings, beyond question.

It was the highest innings of which I have seen part, eclipsing the fruitlessly tedious 275 to which Darryl Cullinan subjected us at Eden Park in 1999 despite Amnesty International’s intervention. It was a privilege to be there. If only we Sunday spectators could have appreciated quite what it was we were watching.

A note for my fellow pedants

Ever since I started writing Scorecards I have agonised about the use of the upper case for “test” as in match. When I worked for CricInfo its style guide (a thin publication) insisted that the word should always begin with a “T”. It has never made any sense to me to have an upper-case adjective followed by a lower-case noun. So with a shout of “Eureka!” I have decided that from now on in these columns it will be “test’ as an adjective and “Test” as a noun.

Now, should “Eureka!” begin with the upper case?...

Saturday, May 24, 2014

New Zealand v India, 2nd Test, Basin Reserve, 14 – 18 February 2014: second day

A period of reflection is sometimes appropriate; such is my explanation for the three-month gestation of this report on what became one of the great New Zealand Tests. It still beats Wisden by eleven months. I was there from tea on the first day to the close on the third.

The marketing people get brainier by the day. New Zealand Cricket’s latest wheeze to get people through the gates is to stage an extract from Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead at the start of each international match. Guildenstern—a sensitive performance by Brendon McCullum—tosses a coin. Rosencrantz—MS Dhoni’s interpretation was as moving as any by an Indian captain in a leading role since the Nawab of Pataudi junior’s groundbreaking Hedda Gabler at Headingley in ‘67—calls heads and wins.

That is the most reasonable explanation for law-of-probability-defying run of seven tosses in a row won by the Indian skipper. And a lot of good it has done him. Four defeats and a tie in the ODIs were followed by a 40-run loss in the first Test at Eden Park.

Our inbred pessimism led home supporters to expect payback and it was no surprise to arrive at the Basin at tea on the first afternoon to find New Zealand all out for 192, Ishant Sharma six for 51.

Murali Vijay was out to the last ball of the second over of the reply, unable to get the gloves out of the way of a Southee delivery that came in with extra bounce. The odd play and miss aside, the batsmen looked comfortable and it was a bit of a surprise when Pujara fell leg before to a Boult inswinger just before the end. As often happens when the side bowling second is defending a small total, the New Zealand bowlers were bit anxious and too keen to make things happen rather than concentrating on the basics.

Nightwatchman Ishant Sharma provided the early entertainment on Saturday with shots of pure cock-eyed optimism. The fifty partnership came from 73 deliveries. Southee continues to chip batsmen with the vocabulary of a bowler ten kph faster than he actually is; Sharma will have made a note of Southee’s view of his bouncer-avoiding technique, which finished with the batsman flat on his back in the crease. Sharma was caught behind off Boult trying to repeat a cover drive for four.

At the other end, opener Shikhar Dhawan was showing why the Australian writer Chloe Saltau had recently picked him in her World XI. He cuts like a Savile Row tailor. However, it was still perplexing a couple of months later to open Wisden to find that Dhawan was one of the Almanack’s five Cricketers of the Year. The choice of the five is made on their performance in the previous English season, so how did Dhawan win in a year in which Australia and New Zealand toured? I had forgotten all about the Champions Trophy, which is easy to do. He had wowed Wisden editor Lawrence Booth with a couple of dashing centuries in the group stage, but it is still cricket’s least-merited accolade since Paul Collingwood’s seven-run MBE in 2005. The other four Cricketers of the Year were Ryan Harris, Chris Rogers, Joe Root, and Charlotte Edwards. It is a measure of how the three-nil result in the 2013 Ashes failed to reflect the narrow gap in talent between the two sides that two Australians and only one Englishman are named (though the fact that no one can be a Cricketer of the Year more than once may have influenced this too). It used to be the case that one of the five would be a county stalwart. I commend Darren Stevens to you, young Booth.

Here, Dhawan was out two short of a century, edging a Southee outswinger to Watling. Rohit Sharma soon followed for a duck to become Jimmy Neesham’s first Test wicket off as poor a ball as the debutant will ever take one with, a wide half volley that Sharma dragged on. At 165 for five a degree of parity had been restored, but India’s new hero, Virat Kohli, was in.

Kohli was fluent until succoured by a McCullum ruse. Neil Wagner maintained a line a couple of feet wide of off stump with two short extra covers. For some time Kohli resisted, but the apple was too big and juicy and the first time he tried to take a bite Rutherford, the straighter of the two fielders in the trap, took the catch.

MS Dhoni joined Ajinkya Rahane at the crease with both preferring to accrue through boundaries. At mid-afternoon drinks 28 of Rahane’s 38 had come that way, and Dhoni had hit the first four balls of the preceding over for four. A sensible bowler would have stayed quiet and tried to blend in with the surroundings, but Wagner continued to chip the Indian captain, and made himself look mightily stupid by doing so.

The advent of the new ball after tea merely accelerated the scoring rate. New Zealand’s only idea seemed to be to feed Dhoni’s ramp shot in the hope that he might feather one. So it was a surprise when Dhoni fell to a short ball from Boult that he could easily have left alone. This brought in Ravindra Jadeja, a Test No 9 with three first-class triple centuries to his name.

Jadeja showed no inclination to dig in or run singles and greeted Wagner’s return to the attack by sending the first two deliveries to the boundary, the second impishly between slip and gully. He was caught at second slip off the following ball, all but two of his 26 coming from boundaries.

Rahane was now ten short of his maiden Test century and will not have been reassured by the entrance at No 10 of Zaheer Khan, a batsman unable to pass a swash without attempting to buckle it. Predictably enough he attempted to send the second ball he received down the Mt Victoria Tunnel. Rahane met the situation calmly, upping the tempo without risk and two overs later pulled Anderson to the mid-wicket boundary to join the centurions. With a hooked six he brought up Wagner’s century a little later, from a mere 22 overs.

Earlier that over Wagner thought that he had bowled Zaheer, only for a replay to show that he had no-balled by cutting the return crease with his left foot (he was bowling round the wicket). My seat high in the Vance Stand looked right down the line of the violated crease and I am sure that he was bowling one or two no balls an over in this manner, so had no sympathy for him. Did Wagner shut up? He did not.

It took a piece of fielding as classy as the innings itself to dismiss Rahane. Boult sprinted in from the cover boundary and dived full length, scooping the ball one-handed an inch from the turf. It contends with Boult’s own flying leap to dismiss Denesh Ramdin at the Basin late last year as catch of the season.

Another flurry of eyes-shut slogging from Zaheer took India to a final score of 438, a lead of 236 with more than three days still to go. As Fulton and Rutherford came to the crease it was the nature of the defeat that was being debated; would India have to bat again?; would play go beyond the third day? The fact of defeat was no more worthy of debate than the setting of the sun.

Peter Fulton lasted only into the second over when he padded up to a Zaheer Khan inswinger. The raised finger of umpire Steve Davis cued a lot of rot from the radio commentary box, where it was agreed that the decision was a travesty. Firstly, had the decision review system been in operation it would have supported the decision by showing the ball clipping the off stump. Secondly, any opening batsman padding up to a swing bowler of Zaheer’s pedigree is asking for all the trouble that comes to him. It was further evidence that, for all the heroism of Eden Park last year, Peter Fulton does not have what it takes as a Test opener.

Rutherford and Williamson shepherded New Zealand to the close, but the football fans present consoled themselves with the thought that on the morrow they would be able to watch the rest of the Test and be in their seats at the Cake Tin as the Pheonix kicked off at 5 pm. If you had told us that the game was almost 72 hours away from a finish we would have called an ambulance for you, and probably the police as well.

To be continued.

6 to 12 September 1975: Another Dull Lord’s Final

For the second time in the 1975 season a Lord’s final was an anti-climax, and for the same reason as the first: Middlesex batted first and d...