Houston
Astros at the Toronto Blue Jays, Toronto SkyDome, 1 September 2019
At
the baseball, it happened first time, the day at the Toronto SkyDome that
Justin Verlander pitched his third no-hitter.
In
the manner of Charters and Caldicott, my Khandallah correspondent and myself were
making our way back to Kent in time for the end of the County Championship
season. By the start of September we had reached Toronto, where I achieved one
of my outstanding ambitions in spectating: to watch a Major League Baseball
game. What a day to choose.
Readers
with long memories and dull lives may recall that I attended a Minor League
game on my last trip to the Northern Hemisphere, in a lovely
little stadium in Vancouver. That thoroughly agreeable experience could
be compared to a pleasant day at the cricket in a way that this Toronto game
could not (though that won’t stop the mad professors behind The Hundred
trying). For a start, it was indoors, at the SkyDome (now called the Rogers
Centre, but I’ll stick with Wisden’s practice of avoiding sponsors’ names as
they are liable to change). It has a fully retractable roof, which remained
shut here.
It is
a most impressive venue, right in the heart of Toronto, nestled up against the
CN Tower. It is everything that a contemporary stadium should be, so I was
surprised to discover that it is thirty years old. Our own dear Cake Tin in
Wellington is ten years younger, but it is as if someone from the council had
been to Toronto and insisted that a copy be made based entirely on their
description of what they could remember, without recourse to plans or
photographs. So the concourse of the SkyDome is open to the field, not shut off
from it by a concrete wall; the blocks of seats are sensibly smaller, so it is
not necessary to trigger a Mexican wave by making a dozen people stand in turn
if you want to leave your seat.
It
helps that baseball stages the main action on the edge of the field, so at
least half the spectators are closer to the players than they could ever be at
the cricket. Our seats were, so to speak, at fly slip, halfway to the boundary,
binoculars superfluous.
The
Blue Jays were fourth of five teams in the East Division of the American
League, any hope of qualifying for the post-season long gone, the
Leicestershire of the New World. The Astros led the West Division and had the second-best
record in the major leagues this year, so were anticipating the post-season and
the possibility of a World Series. The contrasting records of the two teams may
explain why half of the stadium’s 50,000 seats were unoccupied. Similar ratios
at county cricket grounds lead to photos of empty seats in the paper,
illustrating articles on a dying game. Of course, the Blue Jays come a distant
second in the city’s sporting loyalties to Toronto’s NHL team, the Maple Leafs
(sic), who have a membership waiting list of which MCC would be proud.
Baseball
benefits from being a sport designed for commercial television before John
Logie Baird had even been born, with its 17 breaks between innings over three
hours or so. At the stadium, these intervals are filled with all manner of
distractions, but in contrast to what happens at the Cake Tin and what I picked
up from television coverage of the World Cup and the T20 in the UK, the
announcer did not labour from the misapprehension that the sport was there to
fill the gaps between the main attraction. There was plenty that was
informative. Baseball, even more than cricket, generates numbers as a frog does
spawn in spring and the arrival of each batter at the plate saw a soup of
statistics displayed on the big screen, so that those of us to whom the names
meant nothing knew as much as we wanted about their form and potential. We got
there an hour or so before the start, so learned that the pitcher’s mound is
prepared as tenderly as any 22-yard grass strip.
There
is no toss; the visitors always bat first, so it was Wilmer Font who went to
the mound to pitch for the Blue Jays. In cricket, the batsmen are generally
regarded as the aristocracy, the bowlers the proletariat. In baseball, the
pitchers are the elite. While the rest of the team follows a gruelling 162-game
programme over six months, the lead pitchers play only once every four of five
games, or have specialist roles for a couple of innings a game. Matches are
presented as pitcher against pitcher, so today it was Verlander v Font.
Font lasted
only two innings, though it was difficult to understand why. In the first
Bregman got to first base, on a “walk”, (when four pitches are ruled not to be
in the strike zone and the batter hasn’t tried to hit them); in the second,
Diaz doubled (got to second base), but no runs resulted. Unless things start to
go badly wrong, the starting pitcher customarily lasts for six or seven innings
before being replaced, so it was a surprise that Font was replaced for the third
inning. Either he was injured or the coach had been studying T20 captaincy, a
tenet of which appears to be that the better an opening bowler performs, the
more likely they are to be taken off.
For
the Astros, it was Justin Verlander, the Jimmy Anderson of baseball, a pitcher
with a sustained record of excellence over a 15-year career. A former winner of
the Cy Young Award for the pitcher of the year, a couple of weeks after I saw
him he became just the eighteenth player to pass the 3,000 strike-out mark. He
walked to the mound as one of only 36 pitchers to have pitched two no-hitters.
He left it nine innings later as one of six to have pitched three or more.
For
the purposes of this piece it is important to understand what a no-hitter is.
It is when no batsman from one team reaches first base having hit the ball.
Walks— see above—do not count against the pitcher’s record in this respect as the
batter has not hit the ball in order to proceed to first base. There was just
the one walk, Cavan Biggio, second up in the first, but he proceeded no further,
and was the only Blue Jay to reach first base.
To
understand the magnitude of this achievement you have to know that before this
game there had been only 302 no-hitters pitched in the major leagues, which
have a history back as far as 1876. What’s more 14 of these were achieved by a
combination of pitchers across the nine innings. This was just the fourth
instance this year, and that was one more than last year; 2016 and 2017 saw one
each.
What
would be an equivalent achievement in cricket? A hattrick? As I have recorded
here before, I have witnessed seven of these across all forms of first-class,
list A and the equivalent. Though it seems that I have beaten the averages to
reach that number, it suggests that hattricks are far more common. One
experienced baseball journalist reported that it was the third no-hitter that
he had seen in more than twenty years, during which he has probably watched
more than a hundred games a season. All ten would be too rare, so perhaps nine
wickets in an innings by a bowler would be a comparable cricketing achievement.
This has been achieved 19 times in tests (including Laker and Kumble’s
all-tens). I have never seen it done, but Kyle Abbott managed it for Hampshire a
week or so later; I suspect that the chances of seeing a nine-for are about the
same as being there for a no-hitter. There must be any number of people who
have spent as many days at the baseball as I have at the cricket, yet have
never seen a no-hitter.
People
who want to decry T20 often say that it is no more better than baseball, which
shows that they have no idea about baseball, a game of which is a three-hour
slice of test match. The constant action and movement of the scoreboard that
short-form cricket demands is not guaranteed or even desired in baseball. I heard
a presenter on a Toronto sports radio station bemoan the increased number of
home runs being hit this year. Of one high-scoring game where they were
responsible for all but one run he asked “where’s the baseball in that?”. There
is a man who would appreciate a day at the Scarborough Festival.
As in
first-class cricket, spectators are tolerant of apparent inactivity in the
expectation of something interesting occurring soon. This game was an extreme
example of this. After eight innings the score was 0–0, which is very different
from saying that nothing had happened. The Astros made it as far as third base
in the second and seventh innings. Whenever a runner is on base a sharpened
sensory perception develops around the stadium. If no or one batter is out the
main job of the man at the plate becomes not to biff a home run, but to move on
the player ahead of him, even if he has to sacrifice himself to do so. This is
how Diaz and Alvarez respectively got to third. But with two out it becomes much
more difficult to get home, as the batter at the plate has to get to first for
any run to count. So it was here, as a fly ball to left field and groundout to
shortstop ended the innings (and let us wallow for a moment in baseball’s
exotic lexicon).
At
the bottom of each inning Verlander was a Victorian bodice into which the Blue
Jays batters were tied, struggling for breath. Here was a 36-year-old, the most
dangerous pitcher on the team as it headed for the post-season. The instinct of
the manager must have been to pull him out after the usual six or seven innings
rather than risk injury or exhaustion, but baseball’s reverence for its history
was more compelling. A pitcher with a shot at a no-hitter would be given his
chance.
But
Verlander needed help. With no score on the board at the end of the eighth
inning, he faced the prospect of having to pitch for more than the standard
nine innings to register a no-hitter, as the match would continue until there was
a winner. America’s intolerance of the draw is much mocked (though a game which
decides a World Cup on boundaries hit lives in a glass house in which the
throwing of stones is unwise), but in baseball the inevitability of resolution
means that in a stalemate the tension increases rather than dissipates.
First
up for the Astros in the ninth inning was Alex Bregman, who got to second on a
pop up (a hit that goes higher than it does laterally) that eluded first
baseman Smoak. Alvarez was struck out for one down, then Diaz was out, caught
in centre field, but allowing Bregman to move to third.
Abraham
Toro came to the plate, the last chance for Verlander to wrap up the no hitter
in the ninth. Home fans had a dilemma: a win or history? Toro hit a fly towards left field, but it did
not have the immediate stamp of a game-winner. Surely it would be what they
call playable, able to be caught. But as it descended it became clear that it was
wide of the fielder and a little stronger. The ball sighed over the fence for a
home run, taking Bregman with it for a 2–0 lead.
Verlander
now had certainty that removal of the next three batters would give him the
prize. First up was Drury whose swing was collected by shortstop Bregman who calmly
threw to first base for the play. A slider struck out McGuire with the first
pitch he faced, Verlander’s 14th strike out of the game, the second-best of his
career.
The
Blue Jays were now back at the top of their order with Bo Bichette, whose three
previous at-bats had not given the impression that he would ever die wondering.
Sure enough, he swung at the fifth pitch he received. It went straight to third
baseman Altuve, who may never again make a throw across the diamond to first
under such pressure. He executed it perfectly, Bichette dismissed as the ball
lodged in the glove of first baseman Diaz.
Verlander’s
teammates rushed from the dugout to laud him and the crowd gave him a generous
and prolonged ovation. It was the second time for some of them; one of
Verlander’s two previous no-hitters had also been at the SkyDome, for the Detroit
Tigers. He became the first ever to pitch two no-hitters at the same away
venue.
Perhaps
when Bob Willis rolled over Australia in 1981, or Ben Stokes did the same a
couple of months ago, somewhere in the Headingley crowd there was somebody
spending a day at the cricket for the first time, defying the odds as I was
fortunate to do at the Toronto SkyDome.
No comments:
Post a Comment