There is a report in the March edition of the Wisden Cricketer on the development of a wicketkeeping ranking system. Developed by Adam Crosthwaite, a wicketkeeper for New South Wales, it is modelled on the baseball system, calculating the percentage of chances taken of those offered, and expressing the result as a decimal.
The thrust of the system and the report is sound: a wicketkeeper should be judged not by how many chances he takes, but by how many he misses. I had no reason to become agitated until I read the final paragraph, which begins thus:
"We may never know if Alan Knott rated higher than Rod Marsh..."
I can be of assistance here.
Alan Knott was a far better wicketkeeper than Rod Marsh, and any system that concluded otherwise would not be worth the numbers it crunched.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Currency of Centuries: Days 2 & 3 of the Second Test
Scorecard McCullum makes 302 to save a game that looked like it would be over in three days…Bangladesh lose after making 595 batting first...
-
If, under threat of some kind of cruel and unusual punishment, such as death or having the cricket writing of Piers Morgan read to me, I wa...
-
Kent v the International Cavaliers 1966: http://www.cricketarchive.com/Archive/Scorecards/104/104252.html Kent v the International Cavalie...
No comments:
Post a Comment