The Ashes were the main attraction of 1972 and The Cricketer was fortunate to have John Woodcock as its test match reporter. The July edition carried his account of the first test, played at Old Trafford in early June.
England won a seam-dominated match by 89 runs. John Snow
took eight wickets, backed up by Geoff Arnold and Tony Greig with five each.
Greig was making his test debut, though this would have come as a surprise to
him, given that he had appeared four times for England against the Rest of the
World in 1970, contests that were regarded as test matches at that time. He was
also ever present in the Rest of the World team that had played in Australia
the previous winter, matches that were never categorised by the Australians as
tests, though, as
discussed here previously, they were manifestly of test quality.
Greig also made two half centuries at Manchester.
Anybody who has read much of this blog will know of my
admiration for John Woodcock, but he did have a blind spot when it came to the
nationality qualifications of England cricketers in general, and of Tony Greig
in particular. It will be remembered that he wrote that one of things that
explained the Packer schism was that Greig was “not a proper Englishman”. His
report here develops this theme.
The ideal England team would
be composed of Englishmen, pure and simple. One might have said the same when
Ranji, Duleep or Pataudi were playing, or when D’Oliveira was first picked. If
I were an Australian I might wonder about the fairness of it all.
But then I might count up the number of Aborigines in the
Australian team, find that there were none, and reflect that my team consisted
entirely of players who were, in the great scheme of things, recent immigrants
themselves.
Woodcock reports that only 36,000 attended the test, which
lasted well into the fifth day. That is less than a third of those who went
through the gates of Old Trafford for the equivalent fixture in 2019, a comparison
that those who argue that test cricket is on permanent decline should note.
Alex Bannister, long-serving Cricket Correspondent of the Daily Mail (and no relation of Jack
Bannister, as far as I know) had a series running featuring a different county
each month. In July it was Worcestershire. The article ranges between the past
and the present in a pleasing way. I learned several things, including that
county secretary Mike Vockins was an agricultural biochemist (which might have
come in useful when the Severn made one its regular visits to the Worcester
outfield), and that the Nawab of Pataudi senior (the same as cited by Woodcock,
above) became a Worcestershire player only after having been turned down by
Kent. This would have been around the time that Lord Harris insisted that
Walter Hammond had to serve a two-year qualification for Gloucestershire
because he had been born in Dover while his soldier father was stationed there,
so perhaps embracing Pataudi would have been a double standard too far, even
for that scion of the aristocracy.
Bannister rated the 25-year-old Glenn Turner highly.
There are two Turners – one
intent on crease occupation; the other a magnificent strokemaker. In either
mood – and I prefer the latter – he is one of the world’s leading batsmen.
Another New Zealander, John Parker, was on the
Worcestershire staff in 1972. Years later, when I was writing for CricInfo, Turner and Parker joined us in
the press box at Seddon Park in Hamilton and reminisced about their New Road
days. The conversation turned to the use of statistical analysis in modern
coaching. One or other of them said something along the lines of:
We had a computer that gave
feedback based on the study of the available data. It was called Norman Gifford
and it used to stand at short leg giving insightful readouts such as “what the
eff are you bowling that effing crap for?”.
I am writing on T20 Blast finals weekend, against which
the ECB have scheduled an ODI against India, thus depriving the participating
counties of their international players. A similar issue half a century ago saw
the boot on the other foot. Surrey and Sussex both refused to release their
players to appear for MCC against the Australians in the traditional pre-tests
fixture, preferring to retain their services for the Benson and Hedges Cup. I
generally avoid a romantic view of cricket in those days, but a time when
counties could tell Lord’s to stuff it was a great one in which to be alive.
Denis Compton and John Snow both defended the decision,
but the majority of the cricketing establishment was outraged. Crawford White
of the Daily Express wrote that “as a
member of Surrey for 20 years and more, I think that this is a disgraceful
decision”. MCC Secretary Billy Griffith
called it “absolutely deplorable”, while EW Swanton, as Bryon Butler put it in
his monthly press review, “drew his sword”.
History of a most regrettable
sort has been made…It never occurred to me for a moment that this fixture would
not be held sacrosanct…In football, one hears, England suffers from the
selfishness of clubs. That is football’s affair. It is cricket’s affair to put
country first rather than the short-term financial advantage of a sponsored
competition, however good in itself…cricket has been done a grave disservice,
which is sure to have strong repercussions.
This is vintage Swanton. “Football” and “sponsored” become
terms of abuse. MCC is awarded dominion status. We see in our mind’s eye the
oafish member of the lower classes to whom he slips sixpence for furtive news
of the association game. And he gets it completely wrong. By the way, that
whirring noise is Swanton turning like a rotisserie chicken at the news that the
Varsity match has been exiled from Lord’s.
John Arlott profiles Peter Lever. His opening paragraph
will move any of us who treasure county cricket.
The heart of English cricket
is the county game; and the essence of county cricket is not the Test star who
dominates it but the ordinary county cricketer who is there every day and gives
it his constant and fullest effort. He does not, like the representative
players, miss a dozen county games a year to play for his country. He is a man
for all seasons; county cricket is for him an achieved peak and a fulfilment.
But the highlight of the July edition comes in the School
Review. It is the historic first appearance in the press of the great CJ Tavaré.
Then captain of Severnoaks School, he made 116 including 12 fours and—wait for
it—ten sixes.
No doubt this news will provoke ill-judged and distasteful
remarks from the class of person who in earlier times would have earned a crust
by slipping news of Aston Villa’s away form to Swanton, and who know Tav only
as the obdurate fellow who was the tax manual of England’s batting in the early
eighties. But it will come as no surprise to those of us who knew the Sunday
Tavaré, the man who would dismantle any attack in the country over 40 overs. Three
of the Australians at Old Trafford would still be around in 1982/3 to play tests
against Tavaré.