I was pleased that Somerset won the
last Lord’s one-day final. It seemed fitting that a county outside the
metropolitan elite (in whose number Hampshire, by their own choice, are counted
these days) should enjoy county cricket’s last day on the biggest stage of all.
There was a certain personal symmetry about it too. I was at Lord’s for
Somerset’s first final in 1967, and for their first win, in 1979, the year that
we have reached in this series of posts on Lord’s finals about which I can say
“I was there”.
Britain had recently emerged from the
Winter of Discontent, and Mrs Thatcher was in Downing Street, but the state of
the nation is never representative of all its people; my own levels of content,
at the end of my first year at Bristol University, were at a record high.
I can’t quite remember why I decided
that I would go to both the Lord’s domestic finals that year, whoever was in
them. It may have been an afterthought when applying for tickets for the World
Cup final. Clearly, the price of tickets was within a student’s budget; Mrs T
had not yet taken our grants away.
Essex
played Surrey in the 55-over competition in July, while Somerset opposed Northamptonshire
in the 60-over final in September. It was a good year to be a disinterested
observer in St John’s Wood and a privilege to be present when both Essex and
Somerset won their first trophies in more than a century of existence. Tears in the eyes of grown men…“if only Dad
had lived to see this, how happy it would have made him…” etc. And there were centuries
by two great batsmen, though the greatness of only one of them was apparent by
1979.
What John Woodcock thought of all this
I don’t know; The Times was in its
year-long shutdown and missed the 1979 season completely, so there are no
extracts from its archive in this piece.
I had watched two games in the
55-over competition before the final. My season began as it did for many of the
next 19, in the bracing April breezes of the County Ground in Bristol. Gloucestershire
despatched Minor Counties (South) with ease, Procter 11-5-18-2 and 82 not
out. Two weekends later I returned to Kent
for the visit of Middlesex. John Shepherd took three wickets for one run
early on, and the Londoners reached 178 only because Mike Gatting and Phil
Edmonds put on 75 for the sixth wicket. Knocking it off would be, we thought, a
matter of routine, and I felt superior in already having my final ticket when
everybody else would be scrabbling for theirs later. Kent were all out for 73,
their lowest List A score (but, as we will see, not for long).
So to the final. I got to Lord’s, as
I did for most of these finals, soon after the gates opened at nine. My basic
ground admission ticket gave access to the lower tier of around much of the
ground. For all the finals in which Kent
were not involved I watched from the stands at the Nursery End at long on for
the right-handed batsman. No seats were allocated, so it was first-come-first
served, but that worked well as like-minded spectators grouped together. In my
area the ratio of people to Playfair annuals to pork pies was as near to 1:1:1
as makes no difference. Those there to drink and chant went to the Tavern Stand
(this group was bigger for the July finals, outside the football season). Short
people could choose not to sit behind tall people. The insistence on sending us
all to particular seats was one of the reasons I stopped going so regularly,
particularly after I found, in 1985, that my seat was directly behind the
sightscreen.
I still like to get to grounds early,
especially on big occasions. I’d go into the museum, walk around the ground, watch
the players in the nets, and be back in my seat for the toss, won that day by
Surrey’s Roger Knight, who did what most one-day captains did then and put them
in, perhaps unwisely given that Sylvester Clarke was missing through injury and
Robin Jackman playing despite struggling for fitness.
Opening the batting were Mike Denness
and Graham Gooch. It was good to see Denness back at Lord’s, the only Essex
player to have played in a previous county final, though Gooch had been there
just a month before at the World Cup final (as had I). There he made 32 batting
at No 4, but had been left in a hopeless position by Brearley and Boycott’s adoption
of appeasement as an approach to chasing 286 (on the day of writing this, New
Zealand adopted the same method in the World Cup to chase Australia’s 243, with
equally disastrous results). Gooch had also—along with Boycott and Larkins—been
a third of a fifth bowler against Richards, Lloyd, Greenidge and the rest, but a
month later did not bowl a ball against Butcher, Roope and Lynch.
Gooch’s promise was universally
acknowledged, but at that point unfulfilled. It was four years after his
disastrous double-duck debut at Edgbaston, the last test in England where an
uncovered pitch changed the course of the game. He had returned to the England
team in 1978, filling a vacancy caused by the absence of the Packer players. In
the winter’s series against a second-string Australia he had played in all six
tests but reached fifty only in the last of them. Thirteen tests so far, but no
centuries. There were those who thought that he was another English
batsman—Hampshire and Hayes two recent examples—whose promise was no more than
a mirage.
Nobody who saw Gooch bat under the
July sun that day took that view. For the first time on a big stage we saw the
foreboding backlift, the stop-motion movement, the most reassuring front foot
in cricket plonking down to send extra cover into retreat. His 120 was one of
the four finest hundreds I saw in Lord’s finals: Clive Lloyd in the first World
Cup final, Richards a few weeks before and Aravinda de Silva’s losing effort
against Lancashire in 1995 complete the list.
When the names of overseas players
who graced county cricket in the seventies and eighties are reeled off, that of
Ken McEwan is rarely included, which is an omission. He played for Essex for 12
years, in every one of which he topped a thousand first-class runs, and was as
consistent in the one-day game, good enough to bat at any tempo. Here, he outscored
Gooch in a third-wicket partnership of 124, his 72 including ten fours.
McEwan always seemed to make runs
when I was in the crowd. The day of Princess Diana’s wedding was memorable for
me solely for his century at Canterbury. Perhaps the community of cricket
bloggers could collect famous days in history that they recall more for
cricketing reasons.
Essex reached 290, the second-best
domestic final score at that time, beaten only by the 317 that Yorkshire made
in 1965, on the day that hard-hitting aliens took over the body of Geoffrey
Boycott.
The Essex supporters around me couldn’t
have been more nervous had all their mortgages been put on the win. Openers
Alan Butcher and Monte Lynch went before fifty was on the board, then Geoff
Howarth and Roger Knight put on 91 for the third wicket. But it was just a beat
too slow, and the pressure that put on the later batsmen meant that wickets fell
regularly, the winning margin of 35 runs making it look easier than it felt, to
everybody on the northern banks of the Thames Estuary, at least.
Essex followed up by winning the
Championship later in the year, the first of seven titles secured with four
games in hand. No county has represented the soul of county cricket better than
Essex in the four decades since that first happy day at Lord’s.
A few days before Essex’s victory, Lancashire
visited Canterbury for the second round of the 60-over knockout. Kent had
beaten Glamorgan at Swansea in the first round, Underwood 12-5-11-1.
Chris Tavaré has been attracting some attention on social media this week
having been photographed at the launch of Vic Marks’ book (which is on the list
of purchases on our September visit to the UK—we always arrive with light suitcases
and leave with heavy ones, all books). It was good that his appearance prompted
universally positive comments, admiring of the stoutest defence since Leningrad
in the forties. Even more pleasing were the one or two who remembered him as a
Sunday dasher, Clark of Kent, the mild-mannered blocker transformed into flayer
of one-day attacks. It was this persona that turned up at St Lawrence that day,
top scoring with 87 when Kent batted first, and putting on 101 with Asif Iqbal
for the third wicket. Some late hitting from Ealham, Shepherd and Cowdrey took
Kent to 278, a score that would win many more 60-over games than it lost in
that era.
Lancashire’s reply was interrupted by
the weather at 35 for one. A surprise here for younger readers: we all went back
the next day to finish the game. Cricket was not controlled by the accountants
and marketing people to the extent that it is now, so a loss-making second, or
third, day to finish the game properly was considered worth the expense.
Day two did not start well for
Lancashire, with opener Barry Wood retiring hurt a shoulder injury on 24. Wood
was good enough a batsman to play 12 tests, mainly as an opener. He had a fine
reputation as a player of pace, but suffered, as so many in that era did, from
never being given a real run. The same applied to ODIs, of which he was
selected for 13 over a decade. If had started just a few years later he might
have played ten times that number as specialist one-day selections became more
of a norm, his quality batting supplemented by scheming medium pace.
Here, he returned to the crease with
Lancashire in trouble at 124 for five and reached his hundred in under an hour,
supported by keeper John Lyon in a stand of 76 for the sixth wicket. They never
quite caught up with the required rate though and fell well short of the 22
needed from the last over.
It was Asif Iqbal who swept away the
Lancashire top order with a spell of four for five in 17 balls, probably the
most decisive spell of his Kent career. Because of a dodgy back he was never a
regular member of the attack, and some years hardly bowled at all. The
scorecard of this game suggests that he only came on because Chris Cowdrey was
getting tonked, but in heavy conditions such as those that day he could get the
red ball to swing.
It
was off to Taunton for the quarter-final. It was another of several days in
1979 when Kent folk spent the first half of the game thinking that things were
going much more swimmingly than they actually were. Dilley removed openers Rose
and Slocombe early. Richards (44) and Botham (29) were two of four victims for
Bob Woolmer’s deceptive medium pace. Somerset were 45 for four, then 128 for
eight, but Graham Burgess led a rally of the tail that produced 62 for the last
two wickets.
Burgess’s appearance and demeanour gave
the impression of his having left his blacksmith’s forge to play, though in
fact he was a ex-Millfield schoolboy. He was the only survivor of the team from
the 1967 final, and had held his place as the journeymen were replaced by
superstars. In 1979, he knew that his
time was running out and walked out to bat that day with determination borne
from the thought that his last chance of a trophy could be gone if he failed.
Even so, a target of 190 did not seem
daunting. If the last two pairs could bat with such ease, we reasoned, then the
pitch must have detoxed, making a sub-200 target an administrative matter.
What occurred was a cricketing
recreation of Wall Street in the late October of ‘29: panic, helplessness and
collapsing numbers, the Kent batsmen reduced to penury by Joel Garner. It was
the second of three occasions that summer when I watched Garner bowl an irresistible
spell that finished off the opposition, the previous occasion being the World
Cup final. Chris Tavaré went more square on when he found the
pace uncomfortably quick; here his feet pointed straight down the pitch, but he
still got one of five ducks in the Kent innings. Kent’s 60 all out remains
their lowest List A score to this day.
Watching a World Cup game from
Taunton the other day, I realised a sign of the passing years is that what is
now referred to as the “old pavilion” wasn’t built when I first went
there.
An easy victory over Middlesex in the
semi-final took Somerset into the final, where they were favourites against
Northamptonshire, just as they had been against Sussex the previous year, only
to go down by a comfortable five wickets. Just four years before,
Northamptonshire had beaten Lancashire against the odds, so the Somerset fans
were every bit as inclined to read the runes as pessimistically as their Essex
counterparts had been a few weeks before.
Viv Richards was there to reassure
them, in the same way as Gooch had, with a century. It contained many of the same
fine shots as his World Cup final hundred, but was of a different tone, as if he
had been given custody of a fine but fragile piece of priceless china that he
had to deliver safely. Watching Richards bat has been one of the greatest joys
of my cricket watching, a combination of elegance, power and pride that was
quite wonderful. Brian Rose’s 41 was the next highest score, but most of the
rest chipped in for a total of 269.
Garner started as he had at Taunton,
removing Larkins lbw in the first over, then trapped Richard Williams hit
wicket as the batsman wisely tried to put as much distance between himself and
the bowler as possible. It seemed that an early train was again an option, but
Geoff Cook and Allan Lamb put on 113 for the second wicket. Wisden says
that this took just 13 overs, but this has to be a mistake. Nine an over at any
stage was unheard of in those days, and it would etched on the memory and often
written about, surely. Lamb was three years off qualifying for England and this
was the first time that he showed his class on a big occasion. Cook was to
secure a winter in the sun on the back of a Lord’s final performance two years
later, but here was run out for 41, the beginning of the end for
Northamptonshire. Garner returned not so much to mop up the tail as expunge all
traces of its DNA, finishing with six for 29, the best bowling I saw in a
final.
Somerset’s first trophy in 104 years
was followed by a second fewer than 24 hours later. The team, the whiff of
cider in the air all the way up the M1, made their way to Nottingham for the
last day of the Sunday League, which they went into placed second. Their modest
(but in the circumstances commendable) 185 did not suggest that a double was in
prospect, particularly as leaders Kent had three fewer to chase against
Middlesex. At 40 without loss in ten overs, to us at Canterbury it looked
pretty much in the bag. We were the Habsburgs of our time, thinking ourselves magnificent
while bits of our empire were quietly seceding.
All ten wickets fell for 86 runs. News
of this inspired Somerset to induce an even more precipitous collapse, with the
last eight Nottinghamshire wickets falling for 46. A slightly surprised looking
Brian Rose accepted the trophy as if he had been doing it all his life.
