There is a report in the March edition of the Wisden Cricketer on the development of a wicketkeeping ranking system. Developed by Adam Crosthwaite, a wicketkeeper for New South Wales, it is modelled on the baseball system, calculating the percentage of chances taken of those offered, and expressing the result as a decimal.
The thrust of the system and the report is sound: a wicketkeeper should be judged not by how many chances he takes, but by how many he misses. I had no reason to become agitated until I read the final paragraph, which begins thus:
"We may never know if Alan Knott rated higher than Rod Marsh..."
I can be of assistance here.
Alan Knott was a far better wicketkeeper than Rod Marsh, and any system that concluded otherwise would not be worth the numbers it crunched.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A feast of 50 over finals at the Basin Reserve
Men’s eliminator final, Wellington v Central Districts Women’s final, Wellington v Northern Districts Men’s final, Canterbury v Centra...
-
If, under threat of some kind of cruel and unusual punishment, such as death or having the cricket writing of Piers Morgan read to me, I wa...
-
John Arlott would have been a hundred had he been alive on 25 February 2014. He is an odd choice for a hero, but that’s what he was to me....
No comments:
Post a Comment